Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56171/2019bail granted

Santosh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-23Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56171 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2019 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Santosh Paswan Son of Siya Ram Paswan Resident of Village-Piparpainti, Panchayat S.S.B., Police Station-Samho, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Kajra P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

One loaded country made Katta and three live cartridges have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering with the evidence against this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 18.03.2018 having clean antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56171 of 2019(3) dt.23-01-2020 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai Kajra P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T