← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58963/2022bail granted

Mukesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-25Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58963 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2021 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Mukesh Sah, Son of Asharfi Sah, R/O Village- Chak Jamal, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding. Let the defect (s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per prosecution case, recovery of 1782.16 liters of India made foreign liquor was made from a truck and other vehicles including one alto car from which recovery of 45 liters of illicit liquor was made. The petitioner is stated to be the owner of this car.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58963 of 2022(2) dt.25-11-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 06.08.2022. The petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery has been shown from him and also considering the submission of charge sheet along with period of custody of the petitioner and his clean antecedent, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2021, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58963 of 2022(2) dt.25-11-2022 3/3 following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Gautam/daya U T