← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/59/2018disposed

M/S. Sanjay Constructions Through Its Partner Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2018-07-04The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.59 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14499 of 2017 ====================================================== M/s. Sanjay Constructions through its Partner Sanjay Kumar Son of Basudeo Prasad Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Lohar Gali, Musallahpur Hat, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary Cum Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation (A Government of Bihar under taking) through its Managing Director, Shiksha Bhawan, Bihar Rastra Bhasha Parishar Campus, Acharya Shiv Pujan Sahay Path, Saidpur, District- Patna, Bihar

5. The Chief Consultant (Technical) Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (A Government of Bihar under taking), Shiksha Bhawan, Bihar Rastra Bhasha Parishar Campus, Acharya Shiv Pujan Sahay Path, Saidpur, Distict-Patna, Bihar.

6. The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. , Magadh Division, Saidpur, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Smt. Shilpa Singh - GA 12 For the BSEIDC :

Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 04-07-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find no case for modification of the order passed on 13.11.2017 in CWJC No.14499 of 2017. If subsequent to passing of the order any further development has taken place, it gives a fresh cause of action to the petitioner to ventilate it, if permissible in

Patna High Court MJC No.59 of 2018(2) dt.04-07-2018 2/2 accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U