Shashi Bhushan Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35118 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2014 Thana -LAKHNAUR District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Yadav, S/o Nageshwar Yadav, Resident of Village Tilai, Police Station Andhra Tharhi, District Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Poonam Kumari, wife of Shashi Bhushan Yadav, resident of Village Tilai, P.S. Andhra Tharhi, District Madhubani, presently residing with her father Sri Jagat Bandu Yadav, resident of Village Kachhabi, P.S. Lakhnaur, District Madhubani .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the counsel for opposite party no.2.
2. In the light of last order of this Court dated 11.02.2015 parties under some confusion could not file joint affidavit, but it is agreed by the counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner-husband and the informant-wife that both will appear before the Court below on 23.03.2015 when petitioner shall file affidavit stating that he is more than willing to take his wife to her matrimonial home and reside with her, whereafter the wife shall accompany the petitioner to her matrimonial home and continue the matrimonial relation. The Court below will not take any coercive steps against the petitioner so long he is maintaining his
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35118 of 2014 (3) dt.13-03-2015 2/2 matrimonial ties with the wife, otherwise Court below shall be at liberty to deal with the matter as it deems fit and proper. In case, attitude of the wife is not found reasonable, appropriate order in favour of petitioner may also be passed by the Court below.
3. With the observations aforesaid, the application is disposed of.
(V.N. Sinha, J.) Rajesh/- U T