← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59486/2022dismissed

Sanjay Ranjan @ Sanjay Kumar @ Mutur v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59486 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2022 Thana- MARANCHI District- Patna ====================================================== SANJAY RANJAN @ SANJAY KUMAR @ MUTUR Son of Late Dinesh Prasad Singh Resident of village - Maranchi Ward No.- 2, P.S.- Maranchi, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 337, 308, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Barh, District Patna.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59486 of 2022(2) dt.22-12-2022 2/2 from perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is apparent that the petitioner and informant are co-villager and bickering over a land dispute. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature, hence he does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that injuries found upon the victim is grievous in nature which itself clear from the impugned order, I am not inclined the enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Maranchi P.S. Case No.38/2022. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T