← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2934/2024disposed

Raj Mangal Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-21Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2934 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9123 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Raj Mangal Prasad Singh, Son of Late Ramdeo Singh, Resident of VillageGhoswar, P.O.-Rajauli, P.S.-Hajipur Sadar, District-Vaishali. 2.

Vimla Kumari, Wife of Sri Shailendra Kumar Sharma, Resident of VillageJatkauli, P.O.-Dharampur, P.S. and District-Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Mithilesh Mishra, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

Sri Mithilesh Mishra, The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

Sri Shashi Bhushan Ray, the District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4.

Nishant Kiran, The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Vaishali at Hajipur.

5.

Sri Raj Kumar, The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.

Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13 For the A.G.

:

Mr. C. Swaroop, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. By the order under contempt, the writ petition was disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to dispose off the representation of the petitioners after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law.

3. A show cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of District Programme Officer, Establishment, Vaishali at Hajipur.

Patna High Court MJC No.2934 of 2024(3) dt.21-11-2025 2/2 The representation of the petitioners have been disposed off and their claims have been turned down.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks a liberty to assail that order.

5. In view thereof, the present contempt petition stands disposed off, with the liberty aforesaid. (Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U