Anil Sada v. The Union Of India Through Ncb, Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70877 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2023 Thana- RATANPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Anil Sada Son of Sri Bal Kishun Sada Resident of Village - Piprahi, P.O. - Basawanpatti, P.S. - Ratanpur, District - Supaul, Bihar- 852215 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through NCB, Bihar 2.
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Shail Kumari, CGC Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c), 22(c), 29 NDPS Act in connection with Ratanpura P.S. Case No.14 of 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 238 Kg. Ganja from eight white colour large bag. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2023 and also submitted that charges have been framed on 04.10.2023.
4. The learned APP for the State and the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70877 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India, Ms. Shail Kumari submits that since charges have been framed, trail has commenced and the recovery is of huge quantity of Ganja.
5. On query of the Court from the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that as to whether any witnesses have been examined or not, on which the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that there are five charge sheet witnesses out of which three witnesses have been examined.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, accordingly, the regular bail application is rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T