Balbhadra Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.16545 of 2008 (2) dt.18-09-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16545 of 2008 ====================================================== Balbhadra Pandey, son of Surya Narayan Pandey, resident of villageGobardhan Chak, P.S. Belhar, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Deputy Secretary of the Government of Bihar, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.
5. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Bhagalpur.
6. The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Circle Office, Bhagalpur
7. The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Bijikhorwa, Belhar, District- Banka
8. The Sub-divisional Officer, Irrigation Sub-division, Belhar, DistrictBanka. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Nath Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, A.C. to S.C.17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks regularization of his service in the Department of the State Government, where he claims to have worked on the post of Chowkidar since November, 1979 till 20.10.1984 and thereafter on daily wages till January, 2005 as seasonal labourer.
At the outset, learned counsel for the State raises an objection that no such relief can be sought by the petitioner in
Patna High Court CWJC No.16545 of 2008 (2) dt.18-09-2015 view of the law laid down in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others vs. Umadevi (3) and others: (2006) 4 SCC 1. I am inclined to accept the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the State.
The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) V.P.Sinha/- U