Priya Ranjan Rai @ Pirya Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance, Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7955 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1361 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Priya Ranjan Rai @ Pirya Ranjan Kumar, Son of Raja Ram Rai, resident of village - Lehra, P.S. Kargahar, District - Rohtas ( Sasaram ) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. R.S. Roy Mr. Binod Kumar Singh For the Vigilance : Mr. Santosh Kr. pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Special Case No.77 of 2016 arising out of Sasaram (Model) P.S.Case No.1361 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 7/13 (2) of the P.C. Act, 1988 .
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though there is allegation against the petitioner that he demanded Rs.35,000/- for fixation of pay of a Teacher and it is alleged that a C.D. was also produced but there is nothing on the record to show that the C.D. was ever sent for Forensic Science Laboratory test itself or by any other Agency. The petitioner is in custody for about 2 1⁄2 months.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7955 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the Vigilance.
Having heard both sides. In view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody for about 2 1⁄2 months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance Ist, Patna in connection with Spl. Case No.77 of 2016 arising out of Sasaram (Model) P.S.Case No.1361 of 2016 .
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U