Patna High CourtCR. WJC/879/2014dfd for non appearance

Manohar Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-13Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 879 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Manohar Yadav Son of Late Hriday Yadav

2. Ravindra Yadav Son of Manohar Yadav

3. Amrendra Yadav Son of Manohar Yadav All are residents of Village - Ghopa, P.S. Madhepura (Parmanandpur O.P.) District - Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. District Magistrate, Madhepura.

3. Additional Collector, Madhepura.

4. Deputy Collector Land Revenue Madhepura.

5. Circle Officer, Ghailar, District Madhepura.

6. Circle Inspector Ghailar, District - Madhepura.

7. Superintendent of Police Madhepura, District - Madhepura.

8. Officer-in-Charge, Madhepura Police Station District - Madhepura.

9. O.P. In Charge Permanandpur O.P. Ghailar, District - Madhepura. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2015 Prayer is made on behalf of the petitioners for time.

On 10.07.2015 also learned counsel for the petitioners had prayed to adjourn the case and the Court had recorded that the case had been adjourned six times at the instance of the petitioners. The Court had thereafter allowed the prayer subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- Today, learned AC to SC-31 states that the cost has not been received by the State till date. In view of the aforesaid and taking into consideration that admittedly time had been taken and further

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.879 of 2014 (9) dt.13-07-2015 2/2 indulgence given by the Court on 10.07.2015 conditionally subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- and the same also having not been paid and today also time is sought, the Court finds no reason to give any further indulgence. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed for non prosecution.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T