Sanoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62671 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Sanoj Kumar S/o- Barhamdeo Sao Resident Of Village- Manjholi PsParnadabar District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Anisha Kumari D/o- Suresh Sao Village- Neman Bigha Ps- Rajauli DistNawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP For Opposite Party No.2 :
Mr. Alok Kr. Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.
3. As per prosecution case, on the false pretext of marriage, this petitioner established physical relations with the informant and thereafter, refused to marry her.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62671 of 2024(4) dt.09-01-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, both parties are relatives and fell in love with each other and during pendency of this case, both parties have already entered into compromise and do not want to proceed with the case. Annexure-3 is the copy of compromise petition. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 does not controvert with the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner and confirms the fact regarding compromise entered into by the parties.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and compromise between the parties, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge VIth-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Act), Nawada, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 15 of 2024, subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62671 of 2024(4) dt.09-01-2025 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T