← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14555/2015dfd for non appearance

Baban Pandey v. The Union Of India And ORS

2023-08-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14555 of 2015 ====================================================== Baban Pandey Son of Late Rajeshwar Pandey, Resident of villageMubarakpur, P.S.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India, New Delhi 2.

The Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Govt. of India New Delhi.

3.

The National Highway Authority of India through its Chairman-cumSecretary Ministry of Shipping Roa 4.

The Project Director, National Highway Authority, D.I.G. Colony Maqbul Alam Road, Varanasi, U.P.

5.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 6.

The District Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Competent Authority, Kaimur Bhabhua.

7.

The Additional Collector-cum-Arbitrator, Bhabhua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the NHAI :

Mr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate Mr. Saurav Nikunj, Advocate For UOI :

Mr. Priyanka Raj Laxmi, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, G.A.-8 Mr. Neeraj Raj, AC to GA-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-08-2023 Despite repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the National Highway Authority of India, learned counsel for the Union of India and learned counsel for the State are present.

2. Vide order dated 10.08.2023 it transpires that on the said date also no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and one last opportunity was granted, as a matter of last indulgence.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14555 of 2015(3) dt.22-08-2023 2/2 It was also directed that if on the said date, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, appropriate order shall be passed.

3. It transpires to this Court that petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

4. Hence, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed due to non- prosecution.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ravishankar/- U