Sanu @ Sanu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56813 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== SANU @ SANU KUMAR, son of Raj Kumar Prasun, Resident of VillageTample Road, Barari, P.S. Kotwali (Barari),District-Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2019 in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No.232 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 387, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is misconceived and he has been falsely named on account of village politics. It is further submitted that the petitioner has nothing to do with any ransom demand and seizure list also indicates an element of doubt, which is enough to defeat the prosecution case as made by the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56813 of 2019(2) dt.16-10-2019 2/2 that so far as the allegation under Section 307 I.P.C. is concerned, there is no allegation of repetition or any preplanned conspiracy and there has been no recovery of any ransom amount from the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already been in jail for six months and he undertakes to be present in the trial as and when required. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that the petitioner has one other criminal antecedents, in which, as submitted at the Bar, the petitioner has already been extended the privilege of bail, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No.232 of 2019.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T