Channo Yadav @ Chando Yadav @ Chano Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62786 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2022 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Channo Yadav @ Chando Yadav @ Chano Yadav Son Of Lalo Yadav Resident Of Makduyane, P.S. - Manpur, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumari Sujata Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, a free fight took place in between two groups and when the police party tried to pacify the quarrel, both groups entangled with the police party. Thereafter, an indiscriminate firing with illegal weapons started which created an atmosphere of terror. Accused persons including the petitioner created hindrance to the police officials in discharging the official duty.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62786 of 2023(2) dt.22-09-2023 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against him. He was only the member of the mob. He has got no criminal antecedent. Injury received by the injured is simple in nature. No recovery of live or empty cartridge from the spot. Several accused persons, who are similarly situated, have already been enlarged on bail by different co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 3.6.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJMV, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Manpur PS Case No. 191 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U