Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35560/2014rejected

Pritam Sao v. The State Of Bihar

2014-12-24Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35560 of 2014 (4) dt.24-12-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35560 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -389 Year- 2011 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Pritam Sao Son of Krishna Sao resident of village- Tehta Rajain, P.O.- Tehta Police Station- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.L.Verma (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-12-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier while rejecting the prayer for bail of this petitioner this court directed the trial court to conclude the trial of the petitioner preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of order dated 05.02.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53106 of 2013 but the above stated order was received in the court of learned Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad on 07.08.2014 and admittedly, the case of the petitioner is still pending before the above stated court. However, it would appear from the show-cause filed on behalf of Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad that the prosecution case has already been closed.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35560 of 2014 (4) dt.24-12-2014 Therefore, in the aforesaid circumstance, this petition filed in connection with Sessions Trial No. 413 of 2012 arising out of Makhdumpur (Tehta) P.S. Case No. 389 of 2011 pending in the court of Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad is again rejected with direction to above stated court to conclude the trial of the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T