Daroga Mukhiya v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32890 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2016 Thana -KUNDWACHAINPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Daroga Mukhiya S/o Late Deodhari Mukhiya, Resident of Village - Jhauwaram, P.S. - Dhaka, Dist. - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. SSB, through the Asst. Commandant, C Coy, 20 Br., SSB Kundwa Chainpur, Dist. - East Champaran.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the State : Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP For the Union of India : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. CGC Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Union of India. .
2. The petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2016 in connection with Kundwachainpur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 47 and 54 of the Excise Act.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event, there are no independent witnesses to support the accusation. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Kundwachainpur P.S. case No. 37 of 2016 with follow9ing conditions:
(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32890 of 2016 (2) dt.18-08-2016 2/2 petitioner;
(2) That the petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/-Ibrar U T