Siya @ Siya Yadav @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58888 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2024 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Siya @ Siya Yadav @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Son of Balndar Yadav @ Balindra Prasad (Wrongly mentioned in impugned order as wife of Balindar Yadav) Resident of Village - Ghanshyam Bigha, Police Station - Parasbigha, District - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 120(B), 326, 307, 363, 365 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per F.I.R., it is alleged that when informant along with eleven members of Panchayat Samiti were going to participate in the meeting related with no confidence motion, in the meantime, this petitioner along with other named accused persons tried to stop their vehicle and made indiscriminate firing, as a result of which, one person from informant's side sustained injury. It is further alleged that the accused persons also abducted four persons of Panchayat Samiti.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58888 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is the specific case of the informant that F.I.R. named accused persons have committed the alleged occurrence. So far as this petitioner is concerned, he is not named in the F.I.R. and his name surfaced during course of investigation. No specific overt act has been alleged that this petitioner. F.I.R. named accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, vide order dated 13.08.2024 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 37474 of 2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate - Ist Class, Jehanabad in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T