← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14699/2014dismissed

Karun Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-23Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14699 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Karun Kumar Choudhary S/o - Late Birendra Nath Choudhary R/o - Mohalla - Srinagar Hatta, Harijan Hostel Road, Victor Colony, Purnea, Dist. - Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Karmik aur Prashasanik Sudhar Vibhag) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Karmik aur Prashasanik Sudhar Vibhag) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Karmik aur Prashasanik Sudhar Vibhag) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Special Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Karmik aur Prashasanik Sudhar Vibhag) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Additional Mission Director, Bihar Administration Reforms Mission Society (General Administration Department) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Collector of Purnea, Dist. - Purnea.

7. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Purnea, Dist. - Purnea.

8. The Additional Collector of Purnea, Dist. - Purnea.

9. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Purnea Sadar, Dist. - Purnea.

10. The Manager of Information Technology, Purnea, Dist. - Purnea. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to AAG 4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-03-2015 Petitioner was appointed on contract for service and not of service. If the respondents find his service to be unsatisfactory and they decided to take a decision in terms of Annexure- 2, remedy for him is to file a suit for appropriate breach of contract or compensation. Mandamus for continuing such engagement is not warranted nor this Court can go into the allegation and counter

Patna High Court CWJC No.14699 of 2014 dt.23-03-2015 2/2 allegation, which has been made, which led to removal of the petitioner.

Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U