← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55889/2019bail rejected

Mukesh Patel @ Mukesh Pd. @ Nepaliya v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-03Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55889 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2019 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Patel @ Mukesh Pd. @ Nepaliya, Son of Late Sheo Lal Patel Resident of Village- Parmanand Chapra, P.S.- Amnour, District- Saran 2.

Awadhesh Pd. @ Adhesh Kr @ Awadhesh Kumar Son of Late Sheo Sagar Patel Resident of Village- Parmanand Chapra, P.S.- Amnour, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2019 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Amnour P.S. Case No. 185 of 2019, registered under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the A.C.J.M.-II, Saran, Chapra. The accusation is of killing of Chhotelal Rai, younger brother of the informant, Tuntun Rai by his wife Anita Devi, Sailendra Rai and Raj Kumari Devi due to illicit relation of Sailendra Rai with Anita Devi, wife of Chhotelal Rai. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that both the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. In

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55889 of 2019(2) dt.03-09-2019 2/2 course of investigation, Sailendra Rai, who is said to have illicit relation with Anita Devi, wife of deceased disclosed the name of both the petitioners having hand in the murder of Chhotelal Rai.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T