Bipin Kumar @ Bipendra Kumar Yadav @ Dipendra Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66242 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-372 Year-2022 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Bipin Kumar @ Bipendra Kumar Yadav @ Dipendra Kumar Yadav Son of Surendra Yadav Resident of Village- Sonamani Godam ,Ward No -06, P.SSonamani, Dist- Araria. 2.

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh Son of Umakant Singh R/O village- Khuthara, P.S - Kursakanta, Dist- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kr. Thakur, Advocate :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 20/22 of N.D.P.S. Act. 3.

Allegedly, total 40.236 kg ganja was recovered from the grocery shop of co-accused Karan Kumar.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No offence as alleged has ever taken place. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No incriminating article was recovered form the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. They were not apprehended on the spot and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66242 of 2024(3) dt.25-10-2024 2/2 been made accused on the basis of statement of co-accused person. It is further submitted that charge has been framed. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and are under custody since 01.08.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the fact that charge has been framed the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with SPL Case No. 37 of 2022 arising out of Raniganj P.S. Case no. 372 of 2022 with the following condition:- (1) The petitioners shall remain physically present in the court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T