Chandrasen Pratap Singh @ Chandra Shekhar Prasad Singh @ Laddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59782 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2014 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Chandrasen Pratap Singh @ Chandra Shekhar Prasad Singh @ Laddu Singh Son of Late Satyendra Singh R/o Village - Sondih, P.S. - Madanpur, Dist. - Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukul Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 31-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. In this case, the petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2014 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 341, 323, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of C.L.A. Act.
3. On 19.07.2014, during a special campaign, the Commandant of 205 Vahini was proceeding from Deo to Ajan via Madanpur at about 2:25 a.m. When the team reached about 500 meters ahead of the C.R.P.F. camp, a crowd approaching from the opposite direction stopped the vehicles and began pelting stones. The mob allegedly damaged the vehicles with lathis and sticks and attempted to set them on fire.
4. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59782 of 2025(3) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that other co-accused persons, on similar ground, have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.12.2021 in Cr. Misc. No. 80033 of 2019. She has also submitted that the petitioner was not aware of the fact that he has been made accused. No summons or any kind of information has been served upon the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has oppose the prayer for bail.
6. This Court, vide order dated 22.08.2025, called for the xerox copy of the entire order sheets of the court below, which has been received. From perusal thereof, it appears that no summons have been served upon the petitioner.
7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2014, G.R. No. 1416 of 2014, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T