Chandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2992 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2016 Thana -DAUDPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Chandan Prasad, S/o Late Triloki Prasad, Resident of Village- Parsagarh Pasi Tala, P.S.- Akama, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he may be permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion in the course of the day.

Prayer is allowed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 400, 401, 307, 353, 413 and 414 of Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that one Gautam @ Guljara Nat was apprehended by the police. He disclosed that he has assembled with other associates to commit dacoity. He further stated that on 05.09.2016 he had committed theft in R.R. Jewellery by cutting

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2992 of 2017 (3) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 the shutter and had sold the stolen articles to Chandan Prasad (petitioner). On confessional statement of Gautam @ Guljara Nat the police reached the shop of Chandan Prasad and recovered gold and silver articles and also seized diary to show that he had dealing with Nat gang. Chandan Prasad (petitioner) told police that he had purchased those jewelleries from Gautam @ Guljara Nat. From the written report itself it appears that petitioner had jewellery shop. From the written report it is apparent that apprehended Gautam stated that he sold jewellery to this petitioner but no T.I.P. was ever held of the recovered jewellery to substantiate that these were stolen articles. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 142 of 2016, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J.) ravi/- U T