Md. Tahir Hussain v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4453 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Tahir Hussain, Son of Haji Samser Alee, Resident of Village- Rui Tola, Paharkatta, P.O.- Paharkatta, Police Station- Paharkatta, Block- Pothiya, District- Kishanganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Special Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Chairman, Bihar State Madarsa Board, Patna. 5.

The Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Board, Patna. 6.

The District Magistrate, Kishanganj.

7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kishanganj.

8.

The Block Development Officer, Pathiya.

9.

The District Education Officer, Kishanganj.

10.

Jamat Ali, Secretary, Managing Committee Madarsa Tajibul Quran, Paharkatta, Taiyabpur, District- Kishanganj.

11.

Haji Nasiruddin, Chairman, Managing Committee of Madarsa, Tajibul Quran, Paherkatta, Taiyabbur, Kishanganj.

12.

The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Bihar. 13.

Md. Tanveer Alam, Son of Md. Lal Mohammad, Vill- Ratna Harupokhar, P.S.- Paharkatta, District- Kishanganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, AC to GA-12.

For the Respondent-MEB: Mr. Syed Iqbal Ahmad, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 15-07-2019 Heard the parties.

It is a fight in between the two Managing Committee which has led to the writ petition which issue obviously cannot

Patna High Court CWJC No.4453 of 2018(3) dt.15-07-2019 2/2 be entered into in extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the dispute is absolutely private. In such view of the matter, we leave it open for the petitioner to take proper legal recourse as is available to him in law for raising his grievance as raised in this writ petition but in the nature of the dispute raised, we are certainly not persuaded to grant indulgence.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Anjula/- U