Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61095 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Raushan Kumar S/O Pramod Pandit Resident of Village- Godapar, P.S.- Warisaliganj, Dist.- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 356 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 111(4), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 66(B) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that six cyber criminals were arrested from a mango orchard with mobile phones and data sheets.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61095 of 2025(2) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that two mobile phones have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner out of which one mobile phone is registered in the name of his parents and the other one is empty. The petitioner is in custody since 03.07.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 356 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T