Atibh Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13084 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Atibh Ranjan Kumar Son of Sahdeo Prasad, Residence of village -Bahadi Bigha, Onda, Block- Ashthawan District -Nalanda. 2.

Rajeev Ranjan, Son of Vishnudeo Singh Residence of village -Bahadi Bigha, Onda, Block-Ashthawan, District -Nalanda.

3.

Kaku Chauhan, Son of Jagarup Chauhan Residence of village -Amawa Block- Ashthawan, District Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Co- Operative Department Government of Bihar, Patna Vikash Bhavan Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

The Registrar Sahyog Samiti, Bihar Patna, Vikash Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Bihar Chief Election Officer, Bihar State Election Authority, Bihar Patna, 32 Harding Road Patna- 01.

4.

The District Officer cum District Election Officer (S.S.), Nalanda. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Cum Election Officer (S.S.), Ashthawan, Nalanda.

6.

The District Co-operative Officer, Nalanda.

7.

The Assistant Registrar, S.S Nalanda.

8.

The Block Co-operative Extension Officer, Asthawan Nalanda. 9.

Asthawan Prakhand Matsayjivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd., Asthawan Nalanda, through its Administrator namely Goutam Patel, B.C.E.O., resident of blockAsthawan, District -Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amit Prakash ( GA- 13 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-01-2024 Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Amit Prakash, learned GA-13 for the respondent/s.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with a

Patna High Court CWJC No.13084 of 2023(2) dt.04-01-2024 2/2 liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U