Shiv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5430 of 2018 ====================================================== Shiv Kumar Singh, Son of Yugal Kishore Singh, Resident of Village+ P.O.- Chattarpur, P.S.- Chattarpur, District- Palamu (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise and Prohibition and Registration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Patna.
4. The Superintendent of Police, Bihar, Patna.
5. The Officer incharge, Rania Talab, Police Station District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Madan Mohan, A.C. to S.C. 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 27-03-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we direct that pending finalization of the criminal case (Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 39/2018), vehicle of the petitioner (Alto Car bearing Registration No. JH03P-4225) be released to the petitioner on the petitioner furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Patna. In case respondents want to take action for confiscation, they are cautioned to take note of Section 56 of the Act and shall initiate proceedings only if the confiscation proceedings can be initiated in a case like this where there is no seizure of liquor and the vehicle is not used for transportation of liquor and only the driver is found to have
Patna High Court CWJC No.5430 of 2018(2) dt.27-03-2018 2/2 driven the vehicle in a drunken condition. In case confiscation proceedings are initiated and finally it is found that the confiscation could not be initiated being contrary to Section 56, the petitioner shall have liberty to seek compensation to be paid by the officer concerned personally who takes action in the matter.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- U