Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29904/2015bail granted

Md. Jalaluddin @ Laddu v. The State Of Bihar

2016-01-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29904 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2014 Thana -PIPRA District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Md. Jalaluddin @ Laddu S/o Late Muslim Mian @ Muslim resident of village - Salkhua, P.S. Pipra, District - Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under section 304 (B)/34 of the I.P.C Hazaroon Khatoon, the daughter of the informant, was married with the petitioner on 21.02.2009 and thereafter the petitioner and other in-laws killed her and did not inform the informant.

Submission is of false implication and that actually the marriage was performed in the year 2004 and the informant lodged this case under sentiment but after realizing the truth has filed petition in the learned court below wherein he has stated regarding the innocence of the petitioner and his family members.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29904 of 2015 (5) dt.19-01-2016 2/2 The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering that now the informant is not supporting the prosecution version and has retracted from his earlier version and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jitendra Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Pipra P.S. Case No. 48 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T