Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28692/2015disposed

Murar Nath Bhagat @ Ajay Bhagat v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-07-23Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28692 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -182 Year- 2014 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Murar Nath Bhagat @ Ajay Bhagat son of Durga Bhagat resident of Village - Kragahar (Malia Bagicha) P.S. - Karagahar, District - Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Dharmshila Devi wife of Murar Nath Bhagat @ Ajay Bhagat daughter of Kameshwar Bhagat resident of vill - Baraw P.O. + P.S. - Nokha Dist - Rohtas.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kr.Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is husband of the complainant and he is ready to keep his wife on any undertaking. Considering the willingness of the petitioner to keep his wife, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall, after issuing notice to the complainant, grant provisional bail to the petitioner on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28692 of 2015 (2) dt.23-07-2015 2/2 the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sasaram, Rohtas in Complaint Case No. 182 of 2014.

The court below shall make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T