Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37805 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6730 Year- 2015 Thana -GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGOPALGANJ ======================================================
1. Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav Son of late Laxman Yadav Resident of Village- Awdanpatti, PS Mirganj, District Gopalganj .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Suman Devi Wife of Ranjti Yadav, D/o Janardan Yadav Resident of village- Bheldia, P.S. Vijaeepur, District Gopalganj .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dharamveer, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP 183 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-11-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for opposite party and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 504, 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is the husband of opposite party no. 2. The petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit that he is ready to live with and keep his wife with full respect and dignity. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the wife is also ready for restoration of conjugal life.
Considering the undertaking of the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on interim anticipatory bail for three months on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 6730 of 2015 (Tr. No.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37805 of 2016 (4) dt.16-11-2016 successor Court, with the condition that the learned Court below shall monitor the relationship between the parties for three months and if the Court below found it appropriate may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner in the event of non-fulfillment of his undertaking or the Court below, itself, may confirm the bail bond after three months.
(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √