Renu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65488 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2023 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Renu Devi, Wife Of Late Parmeshwary Yadav Vill.- Matiyari, Ward No. 7, P.S. Forbesganj, Dist.- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the IPC were also added.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and is in custody since 23.03.2023. It is next submitted that Pramukh Yadav had approached this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.19975 of 2024 and the same was allowed by an order dated 17.05.2024. It is next submitted that Santosh Chauhan had also approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.16355 of 2024 and the same was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65488 of 2024(2) dt.13-12-2024 2/2 allowed by an order dated 28.03.2024. It is next submitted that petitioner is the mother of the deceased and informant is her daughter in-law. It is next submitted that this Court while granting regular bail and anticipatory bail to the aforesaid accused persons had considered the case on merit and in detail. It is further submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that why the petitioner would have got her own son killed by the accused persons in presence of the informant and would have left the informant alive to become a witness against her.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned IInd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Araria in connection with S.T. No. 444 of 2023 arising out of Forbesganj P. S. Case No.244 of 2023.

6. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T