← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61092/2023dismissed

Pramod Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-16Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61092 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2023 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== PRAMOD SAHNI SON OF LATE YOGENDRA SAHNI VILLAGE BALHA GHATARO, PS- LALGANJ, DIST- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Yugal Kishore, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No.83/2023, registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the IPC. 3.

The petitioner is said to have hit the informant on his head with iron rod.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. Earlier the petitioner's side has lodged a case against the present informant and only with a view to retaliate, the present case has been lodged by the informant. Petitioner has no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61092 of 2023(2) dt.16-10-2023 2/2 criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to assaulted the informant and the injury was found grievous in nature, which is clear from the impugned order itself. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

8.

However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T