Rajesh Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20763 of 2021 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Son of Late Ramesh Nath Tiwari Resident of VillageLaxmi Nagar, Andar Dhala, Near Laxmi Nursing Home, Police StationSiwan Town, Town and District- Siwan- 841226. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna- 800001. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna- 800001.
3.
The Managing Director, Bihar State Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Development Corporation Limited, Block A Fifth Floor, Maurya Lok, Patna800001. 4.
The Managing Director, Bihar State Glazed Tiles and Ceramic Industries Limited, Block A Fifth Floor, Maurya Lok, Patna- 800001. 5.
The Managing Director, Magadh Minerals Limited, Block A Fifth Floor, Maurya Lok, Patna- 800001.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Narendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sudhir Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Pranav Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Shailendra Kumar Ambastha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha ( AAG-7 ) Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs, order(s), direction(s) commanding and directing the respondents to release the arrear salary of the petitioner along with consequential benefit accrued during
Patna High Court CWJC No.20763 of 2021(2) dt.03-04-2024 2/2 the period 1993-1998 and further be pleased to direct the respondents to accommodate the petitioner at any suitable post as other 41 employees of the Corporation and even his juniors have duly accommodated by the respondents vide Memo No. 4726 dated 05.12.2019."
2.
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U