Vijay Sharma v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30064 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -893 Year- 2012 Thana -NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Vijay Sharma Son of Shiv Narayan Thakur, resident of village- Madhopur Dih, Police Station - Chandi, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Pinki Devi, wife of Vijay Sharma, D/o Kailash Sharma, at present residing at Village Bhobhi, P.S. Nagarnausha, Distt. Nalanda. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and learned counsel for the complainant.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Section 498(A) and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act.
The petitioner is the husband and he is ready to keep his wife on any undertaking. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the wife is also ready to live with her husband. Considering the willingness of the petitioner to keep his wife, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall, after issuing notice to the complainant, grant provisional bail to the petitioner on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30064 of 2015 (2) dt.28-07-2015 2/2 (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in Complaint Case No. 893C of 2012. The court below shall make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T