Pratul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4212 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -448 Year- 2016 Thana -GANDHIMAIDAN District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Pratul Kumar, Son of Late Ravindra Prasad Yadav, resident of villageKachchi Dargah, P.S.- Didarganj, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 408, 120 (B) and 381/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the Incharge, ACRM of Ujjiwan Financial services Limited, Exhibition Road, Patna is only for one day i.e. 24.11.2016 and thereafter, he was handed over charge to the CRM, namely, Santosh Kumar Singh on 25.11.2016 and the password of the digital cash vault remains with the CRM, Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh and the allegation against the petitioner is false and concocted. It is further submitted that nothing has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4212 of 2017 (2) dt.09-03-2017 2/2 recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody since 06.12.2016.

Considering the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, Pratul Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-VI, Civil Court, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S.Case No. 448 of 2016.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Sudha/- U T