← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2813/2016dfd for non appearance

Rajendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-12-17The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2813 of 2016 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1328 of 2010 ====================================================== Rajendra Kumar, son of Gobardhan Singh, resident of Village- Tal Bazar, P.O. - Kalpa, P.S. - Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board through its Administrative Officer, Pant Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna Sri Himanshu Rai 3.

The Administrative Officer, Bihar, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna Sri Himanshu Kumar Rai 4.

The Secretary, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Sri Sushil Kumar 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer Jehanabad-cum- Special Officer, Agriculture Produce Market, Jehanabad, Sri Nawal Kishore Chaudhary 6.

The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Sri Sudhir Kumar.

7.

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Sri Ravi Mittal.

8.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Sri Amir Subhani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aag4 Anjani Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-12-2019 The present application has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for violating the order and direction dated 16.07.2015 passed in L.P.A. No. 1328 of 2010 (The Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board &

Patna High Court MJC No.2813 of 2016(4) dt.17-12-2019 2/2 Ors. Vs. Rajendra Kumar) by a Division Bench of this Court. On repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U