Lali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7145 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -566 Year- 2016 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Lali, S/o Lalan Ram, R/o village - Danan Bihia, P.S. Jagdispur, Distt. - Arra ( Bhojpur ) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rashmi Kumari Mandilwar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 566 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though the petitioner is named in the FIR allegation against him is of bag snatching and petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for three months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for three months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ramayan Ram, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 566 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7145 of 2017 (2) dt.20-02-2017 2/2 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If petitioner is indulged in such type of cases in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U