Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11169 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2015 Thana -CHANDI District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Satyendra Yadav, son of Late Jeev Rakkan Yadav, Resident of VillageBhagwatpur, P.S.- Chandi, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2017 Heard both sides.
The petitioner seeks bail in Chandi P.S. case No. 109 of 2015 under Section 304B, 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant, father of the deceased, alleged that his daughter was married to the petitioner in the year 2013 but the petitioner and other in-laws of his daughter started torturing his daughter. The petitioner was demanding motor cycle. The informant further alleged that petitioner and others killed his daughter on 28.11.2015 and cremated her dead body. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is omnibus and general allegation against the petitioner. The wife of petitioner died due to illness. The informant participated in the cremation but from perusal of the records, it appears that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11169 of 2017 (3) dt.07-04-2017 2/2 deceased was being subjected to torture and she was killed and her dead body was hurriedly cremated without giving information to the informant. The petitioner is the husband. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. The learned Judicial Magistrate is directed to commit the case to the Court of Sessions forthwith and upon such the learned trial Judge shall make all efforts to conclude the trial within one year from the date of commitment of the case. If the trial is not concluded within one year from the date of commitment of the case, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T