Paro Yadav @ Parmanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61279 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2024 Thana- SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR DistrictSaharsa ====================================================== Paro Yadav @ Parmanand Yadav Son of Late Jugeshwar Yadav @ Yugeshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Sukhasani, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rashmi Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 506, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, at the instance of the petitioner the co-accused persons surrounded and robbed the informant and assaulted him with the but of pistol and also opened fire.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

2/4 petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons, only specific allegation against the petitioner is that of being an order giver. The injury report of the petitioner shows simple injuries. There is no allegation of causing fire arm injury against any person. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is Ex-Mukhiya and a number of cases has been lodged against him due to political rivalry. The petitioner has criminal antecedent of 19 cases. He has been acquitted in eight cases and in one case closure report has been submitted. The petitioner is on bail in all other cases except two. Learned counsel further submits that there is case and counter case between both the parties and Salkhua P.S. Case No. 15 of 2024 has been lodged by the petitioner against the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2025. The charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner and the co-accused persons.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner and submits that the rejection order shows that a fire arm injury has been caused to the informant and the petitioner appears to be habitual offender

3/4 having a number of criminal cases against him.

6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner is stated to be an order giver and further considering the framing of charge against him, period of custody and submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge -II, Saharsa in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

4/4 petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Siddharth Soni/- U T