Patna High CourtCWJC/24519/2013dfd for non appearance

Bhado Murmu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-06Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24519 of 2013 ====================================================== Bhado Murmu Son Of Somay Murmu, Resident of Village - Bhalguh, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Banka

3. Sub - Divisional Officer, Banka

4. Land Reform Deputy Collector, Banka

5. Deputy Collector Banka

6. Circle Officer, Fullidumar, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka

7. Rasik Lal Murmu Son of Late Tepa Manjhi, Resident of Village - Bhargidha, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka

8. Lal Murmu Son Of Late Tepa Manjhi Resident of Village - Bhargidha, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka

9. Thakur Murmu Son of Late Tepa Manjhi, Resident of Village - Bhargidha, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka

10. Chhotelal Murmu Son of Late Tepa Manjhi, Resident of Village - Bhargidha, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka

11. Kail Murmu Son of Late Sukh Manjhi, Resident of Village - Bhargidha, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka

12. Duba Murmu Son of Late Kanuka Manjhi, Resident of Village - Bhargidha, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka

13. Pradhan Murmu Son of Late Kanuka Manjhi, Resident of Village - Bhargidha, P.S. Fullidumar, District - Banka .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondent No.1 to 6 : Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on his behalf is printed in the daily cause list.

The learned AC to SC-28 appearing on behalf of the official respondents submits that for redressal of his valid grievances, the petitioner ought to have gone to the statutory authority, but since that has not been done, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on that ground alone.

Patna High Court CWJC No.24519 of 2013 (2) dt.06-01-2016 2/2 Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U