Rambali Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70949 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2021 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== Rambali Manjhi Son of Late Ramashray Manjhi Resident of VillageHajichak, Bhui Toli, P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State in virtual court proceeding.

Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of start of normal functioning of the physical court.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khizersarari P.S. Case No. 76 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Recovery is of 2 liters of country made Mahua wine. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that only two liters of country

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70949 of 2021(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/3 made liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner and nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that after investigation police has submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. He further submits that similarly situated, co-accused, namely, Upendra Yadav has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67229 of 2021. The petitioner is in custody since 20.06.2021. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya in connection with Khizersarari P.S. Case No. 76 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70949 of 2021(2) dt.11-03-2022 3/3 as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T