Premlal Singh v. The Patna Municipal Corporation
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21306 of 2019 1.
Premlal Singh Son of Late Kanhaiya Singh, Resident of VillageDamdiha, P.S.-Dawath, District-Rohtas, 2.
Sunil Kumar Singh Son of Sri Kanhaiya Singh, Resident of Janta Road Jakkanpur, P.S.-Jakkanpur, District-Patna 3.
Chandrika Singh Son of Late Gopal Singh, Resident of Village- Budha Chock, Parsa, P.S.-Parsa, District-Patna.
4.
Binod Rai Son of Sri Pradhunath Rai, Resident of Village- Digha, P.S.- Digha, District-Patna.
5.
Raja Ram Son of Late Ramprit Rai, Resident of Village-Fjilabad P.S.- Gopalpur, District-Patna.
6.
Nandu Paswan Son of Birchand Paswan, Resident of Village- Dumari, P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jahanabad, 7.
Amod Kumar Son of Rakat rai, Resident of Purani Jakan, Shiwaji Nagar, P.S.-Jakkanpur District-Patna.
8.
Mantu Kumar Son of Ram Parwesh Rai, Resident of Saristabad, Purbi Tola, P.S.-Gardanibag, District-Patna 9.
Sanjeet Kumar Son of Amarnath Rai, Resident of Village-Jhagirpur, P.S.- Sonpur, District-Saran.
10.
Pramod Kumar Son of Shivnandan Sharma, Resident of Village-Purani Jakkanpur, P.S.-Jakkanpur, District-Patna.
11.
Dharmendra Kumar Son of Jukumchandra Paswan, Resident of VillageBhikhachak, P.S.-Gardanibag, District-Patna. 12.
Anuj Kumar Son of Anil Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Gopalpur, P.S.-Punpun, District-Patna.
13.
Bittu Kumar Son of Rajdeo Singh, Resident of Village-Saichak, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District-Patna.
14.
Md. Rashid Son of Lt. Garul Haque, Resident of Village- Rajapul Manpura, P.S.-Patliputra, District-Patna.
15.
Pravin Kumar Rai Son of Rudal Rai, Resident of Village- Painal, P.S.- Bihta, District-Patna.
16.
Ashutosh Kumar Son of Anil Kumar Singh, Resident of Village-
2/4 Ajarsanda, P.S.-Mufasil, District-Bhojpur.
17.
Rajmantvi Ray Son of Jitan Ray Resident of Dayara, P.S.-Danapur, Khagaul, Patna.
18.
Yuraj Rahul Son of Yugal Paswan, Resident of Mohalla-Dujra Gandhi Murti, P.S.-Budha Colony, District-Patna.
19.
Amresh Kewat Son of Late Prayag Kewat, Resident of Mohalla-R.Block, P.S.-Sachiwalay, District-Patna.
20.
Rajnish Kumar Son of Uday Shankar Paswan, Resident of MohallaSourth Hardingo Road Municipal Quarter, P.S.- Sachiwalay, DistrictPatna. 21.
Santosh Kumar Son of Bachu Prasad, R/o Bihta, P.S. Bihta, Dist.- Patna. 22.
Anil Paswan Son of Dolut Paswan, Resident of Chobi Chak, P.O.-Dahma, P.S.-Bhadaul, District-Patna.
23.
Bhachu Prasad Son of Late Mushan, Resident of Bulathakur, P.O.-Krai, P.S.-Naubatpur, District-Patna.
24.
Ravi Kumar Son of Shivbhajan Rai Resident of Mohalla-Digha Ghat, Donbosco Road, P.S.-Digha District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Patna Municipal Corporation Budha Marg, Patna through its Commissioner, Having Office at Budha Marg, Patna. 2.
The Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budha Marg, Patna 3.
The Additional Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budha Marg, Patna.
4.
The Finance and Account Officer Patna Municipal Corporation, Budha Marg, Patna.
5.
The Executive Officer, New Capital Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s Appearance :
3/4 For the Petitioner/s :
None For the PMC :
Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Advocate CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 15-12-2022 Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s):- "1. That, this writ application is being filled for directing the Respondent authorities to pay the entire due fare/wages of petitioners on account of the services done by their Hydrolic Tractor for the disposal of the garbage from the different areas of the city in New Capital Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna for the period January 2017 to February 2019. The petitioners further pray for directing the respondent authorities to pay the aforesaid due amount with appropriate at least 12% interest. The petitioners also pray for any other relief/reliefs which may deem fit proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
On 12.12.2022, we had passed following order:- "Despite repeated calls, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent/s is/are present. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned.
4/4 List on 14.12.2022."
Even today, despite repeated calls, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioners.
As such, the present petition stands dismissed for default.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 20.12.2022 Transmission Date