← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4858/2017bail granted

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah @ Narayan Ji Sah @ Narayan Jee v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-02Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4858 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2016 Thana -KHUTAUNA District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah @ Narayan Ji Sah @ Narayan Jee Son of Sita Ram Sah, Resident of Village- Pathrahi, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 66 of 2016, registered under Sections 401, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that on receiving secret information about presence of notorious criminal, namely, Keshav Yadav along with other criminals at Kusmar Chowk. The informant and other Police personnel reached there then on seeing the police personnel, some persons were started fleeing after leaving two motorcycles, but on chase, three persons were apprehended, who disclosed their names as Keshav Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar @ Narayan Jee (Petitioner) and Shashi Bhushan

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4858 of 2017 (2) dt.02-03-2017 2/2 Mandal. The apprehended persons did not produce any paper regarding ownership of the motorcycle. On search, mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that petitioner was not apprehended with the motorcycle; rather, he was apprehended by the Police in course of fleeing. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent is in custody since 23.10.2016.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jhanjharpur in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 66 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T