Sangita Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15278 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Sangita Kumari and Ors W/o Sri Raghunath Singh, Resident of Village PostMaricha, P.S.- Tajpur, Prakhand- Morwa, District- Samastipur. 2.

Kumari Puspa Singh, W/o Satyanarayan Singh, resident of VillageSarangpur, Post- Sarangpur Prakhand - Morwa, P.S.- Tajpur, DistrictSamastipur. 3.

Praween Kumar Thakur, S/o Ram Kumar Thakur, resident of VillageSarangpur, Post- Sarangpur Prakhand - Morwa, P.S.- Tajpur, DistrictSamastipur. 4.

Saroj Kumar, Son of Rajdeo Rai, resident of Village- Morwa Rai Tola, PostMorwa, Prakhand- Morwa, P.S. Musri Gharari, District- Samastipur. 5.

Rajesh Kumar Yadav, S/o Sonelal Rai, resident of Village- Raghunathpur, Post- Raghunathpur, P.S.- Tajpur, Prakhand- Morwa, District- Samastipur. 6.

Manoj Kumari, S/o Shayam Sundar Sharma resident of Village- Suryapur, Post- Suryapur Paschimi, P.S.- Tajpur, Prakhand- Morwa, DistrictSamastipur. 7.

Krishan Murari Sah, S/o Late Vishwanath Sah, resident of Village PostKumaiya, P.S.- Tajpur, Prakhand- Morwa, District- Samastipur. 8.

Rekha Kumari W/o Bindeshwar Rai, resident of Village- Wajitpur Karnail, Prakhand- Morwa, Post- Wajitpur Karnail, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur. 9.

Nil Ratan Kumar, S/o Deonarayan Kumud resident of Village- Jorpura, P.S.- Tajpur Halai, Prakhand- Patori, District- Samastipur. 10.

Akhilesh Paswan, S/o Sri Bansi Lal Paswan, resident of Village Umedpur, Post- Bhagwanpur, Panchayat- Modhad, P.S.- Tajpur, Prakhand- Morwa, District- Samastipur.

11.

Shambhu Kumar, S/o Nasib Sah, resident of Village- Sedhi Ward No. 04, Post- Siariya Bhindi, Panchayat- Simariya Bhindi, P.S. Block- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.

12.

Sunil Kumar S/o Shashi Bhushan Yadav, resident of Vill- Kudhwa Tole, Kothiya, Ward No. 10, Post- Janardanpur, PS- Chakmaheshi, DistSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Patna Now Education Department, Go 3.

The Bihar Siksha Pariyojna Parishad, Through its Project, Director Beltron Bhawan, Shastri Nagar, B 4.

The Director, Primary Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prem Prakash Poddar

2/4 For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra- Sc16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2024

1. The petitioners, who were Lok Shikshaks, have filed the present writ application, praying therein to absorb their services on the post of Panchayat Teachers.

2. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioners were appointed as Lok Shikshak for 12 months on contractual basis in the year 2002 at par with Shiksha Mitra.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that Shiksha Mitra has been absorbed as Panchayat Teacher after coming into force Bihar Panchayat Elementary Teachers (Employment and Service Conditions) Rule, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rule, 2006"), but the petitioners have not been considered for absorption/ regularization.

4. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order, dated 21.03.2012, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14493 of 2008 (filed by the similarly situated persons) disposed the writ application with liberty to the writ petitioners to file representation before the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, for consideration of their claim for absorption at par with Shiksha Mitra.

5. Pursuant thereto, the Principal Secretary, Education

3/4 Department, after detailed discussion, vide memo dated 31.08.2015, decided that the Lok Shikshaks are not entitled to be absorbed as Panchayat Teacher and rejected the claim of the writ petitioners.

6. After rejection of the claim of the writ petitioners for their absorption at par with Shiksha Mitra vide order, passed by the Principal Secretary, Education Department, the writ petitioners again approached this Court by filing CWJC No. 1109 of 2017, challenging the order, issued under the memo, dated 31.08.2015.

7. The learned Single Judge disposed the writ application, vide order, dated 30.11.2017, as learned Counsel for the petitioners conceded, to the extent that direction for regularization, after the decision of the Supreme Court, in the Case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi and Others, reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1, that their regularization is impermissible.

8. Learned Counsel for the State submits that Rules have been amended from time to time and now Bihar Panchayat Elementary Teachers (Employment and Service Conditions) Rule, 2023 for appointment of Teachers have been framed and as per the 2023 Rules, the

4/4 appointment of teachers shall be made on regular basis through open competitive examination held by Bihar Public Service Commission.

9. In view of the rival submissions made by the parties and the fact that now Bihar Panchayat Elementary Teachers (Employment and Service Conditions) Rule, 2023 has come into force for appointment of teachers on regular basis, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. 10.The present writ application is accordingly, (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U