Patna High CourtCWJC/9990/2018disposed

Guriya Kumari @ Guriya Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-27Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9990 of 2018 ====================================================== Guriya Kumari @ Guriya Devi, wife of Ranjeet Kumar, resident of villageAshogi Chhapra Dhani, War No.3, Post- Bedaulbaj, P.S.-Purnahiya, DistrictSheohar. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Integral Child Development Scheme, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Deputy Director, Social Welfare Department, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

6. The District Programme Officer, Sheohar.

7. The Block Development Officer, Block- Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.

8. The Child Development Project Officer, Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.

9. Seema Kumari, wife of Amarnath Kumar, resident of village-Ashogi Chhapra Dhani, Post-Bedaulbaj, P.S.-Purnahiya, District-Sheohar. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Mirtunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Smt.Kumari Amrita, GP-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-06-2018 Heard the parties.

In this case, the petitioner is challenging the appointment of private respondent no.9, claiming that she has wrongly been appointed as Anganbari Sevika.

Under the guidelines, the alternative forum has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.9990 of 2018(2) dt.27-06-2018 2/2 provided in the event the person is feeling that he/she has wrongly been deprived and others have wrongly been appointed, may raise complain before the appropriate forum. However, the petitioner without exhausting the alternative remedy, has directly approached this Court.

In such view of the matter, the petitioner, if so advised, may exhaust the alternative remedy by way of filing complaint before the District Programme Officer, who is the competent person to consider the complaint made by the candidate in connection with selection of Anganbari Sevika. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U