Raju Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58943 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2022 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== RAJU RAM S/O LALLAN RAM Resident of village- Papor Tola, Laxmihatta, P.S.- Sarai O.P.- District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-02-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the coaccused persons are alleged to have abused the wife of the informant. On being objected, the co-accused Lalan Ram cought hold of the informant and extorted to kill. Upon this the petitioner attacked on the chest of the informant with a knife

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58943 of 2022(4) dt.17-02-2023 2/3 which hit back of the informant and caused injury. It is further alleged that the petitioner and the co-accused persons assaulted the wife of the informant with fists and slaps and the co-accused also snatched gold chain worth Rs. 20,000/- from the neck of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel has submitted that as per injury report, the informant sustained sharp cut injury on his hand which is on non-vital part and the opinion was kept reserve. The petitioner has two more criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that there is specific allegation of assault against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Siwan in connection with Pachrukhi Sarai P.S. Case No. 89 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58943 of 2022(4) dt.17-02-2023 3/3 the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T