Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.16622 of 2011 dt.10-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16622 of 2011 =========================================================== Narayan Yadav S/O Late Bankai Yadav Resident Of Village-Krishna Nagar Bishawpuria, P.O.-Kalu Chak, P.S.-Kharik, District-Bhgalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Naugachhia, District-Bhagalpur.

4. The Deputy Development Cmmissioner, Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur.

5. The Block Development Officer, Kharik, District-Bhagalpur.

6. The Programme Officer, Kharik, District-Bhagalpur.

7. The Marketing Officer, Kharik, District-Bhagalpur.

8. The Prakhand Supply Officer, Kharik, District-Bhagalpur.

9. Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Bhawanipur Kharik, District-Bhagalpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. ASHOK KUMAR YADAV,ADV For the Respondent/s : None =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter dated 30.06.2011 issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur (Respondent No. 4) and letter dated 20.06.2009 issued by the Programme Officer, Kharik, District Bhagalpur (Respondent No. 6) by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice

Patna High Court CWJC No.16622 of 2011 dt.10-10-2018 under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. None appears on behalf of the respondents, when the matter is called.

5 In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

6. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

7. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 12.10.2018 Transmission Date NA