Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7794/2017bail granted

Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-21Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7794 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2016 Thana -SARAN GRP CASE District- SARAN ====================================================== Dhiraj Kumar, son of Yogendra Ram, resident of Village- Jaitipur, Police Station- Lalganj, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Rail Sonepur P.S.Case No. 84 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and he has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for more than two months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and he has remained in custody for more than two months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7794 of 2017 (2) dt.21-02-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Sonepur, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Rail Sonepur P.S.Case No. 84 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U