Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14612 of 2016 ====================================================== Amit Kumar Son of Sri Ramchandra Prasad Resident of C/o Sahu Enterprises, Bus Stand, P.S. - Rafiganj, District - Aurangabad (Bihar) - 824123.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Engineer-in-Chief-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.
4. Bihar State Road Development Corporation Limited, Central Mechanical Work Shop Complex, Near Patna Air-Post, Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014 (Bihar) through its General Manager (Project).
5. General Manager (Project), Bihar State Road Development Corporation Limited, Central Mechanical Work Shop Complex, Near Patna Air-Post, Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014 (Bihar).
6. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.
7. The In-Charge Officer, District Establishment Branch, Aurangabad.
8. The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited through its Chairman, Bharat Bhawan, 4 & 6 Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, P.B. No. 688, Mumbai - 400001.
9. The Chairman, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bharat Bhawan, 4 & 6 , Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, P.B. No. 688, Mumbai - 400001.
10. The General Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited At & P.O. - Pakri, Via - Anisabad, Patna - 800002.
11. The Territory Manager (Retail), At & P.O. - Pakri, Via - Anisabad, Patna - 800002.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Adv. Mr. Raj Kamal, Adv.
For the Respondent-State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, AC to PAAG-2 For the B.P.C.L. : Mr. Siddharth Prasad, Adv. Mr. Om Prakash, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U