Rajesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11400 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2015 Thana -NOKHA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Rajesh Chaudhary, Son of Baban Chaudhary, Resident of VillageDhunaw Khalasa, P.S.-Nasriganj, District-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Bihari, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 06.05.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 12615 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 22.09.2015 and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded, as up till now not even a single prosecution witness has been examined. Co-accused Narendra Singh and Shiv Jee Singh have already been allowed bail passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44279 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 54777 of 2016. The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that other coaccused have been allowed bail. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11400 of 2017 (3) dt.19-04-2017 2/2 petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Rohtash at Sasaram, in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 147 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T