← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18143/2013allowed

Dr. Ranvijay Narain Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-14Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18143 of 2013 ====================================================== Dr. Ranvijay Narain Singh Son Of Sri Vyas Prasad Singh, Resident Of Parashar House, Parawat Path, Chitragupta Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna-20 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Joint Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Additional Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The Deputy Secretary, Health Government of Bihar, Patna

6. The Principal, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kant For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-09-2018 The learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the present case is squarely covered by a judgment dated 29.07.2011 passed in CWJC No. 657 of 2008, whereby and where-under the date of promotion of the said writ petitioner has been directed to be shifted to the date from which the said writ petitioner was working on the promoted post. The said judgment on which reliance has been placed has been reported in 2012(1) PLJR 424 [ Dr. Dharani Kant Isser vs. State of Bihar & Ors.]. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is allowed in terms of the aforesaid judgment dated 29.07.2011

Patna High Court CWJC No.18143 of 2013 (3) dt.14-09-2018 2/2 passed in CWJC No. 657 of 2008 and the petitioner is directed to be regularized on the promoted post from the date from which he was working on the said post.

Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for benefit of ACP is required to be considered and if it is found to be tenable in accordance with law, the same should be granted to the petitioner herein within a period of four weeks from today. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U